• Daniel Quinn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 year ago

    Ha! I wrote it! Well the original anyway. It’s been forked a few times since I stepped away.

    So yeah, I think it’s pretty cool 😆

    • @zaphod@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Just want to say thank you! Paperless is one of the first things I recommend to anyone considering self hosting their infra. Amazing piece of work!

      • Daniel Quinn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Thanks! The crazy thing is that it’s really not that complicated. I’d say the hardest work was in writing the docs :-). It’s awesome to hear that people still use it and love it though.

      • Daniel Quinn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        Actually, I stepped away from the project 'cause I stopped using it altogether. I started the project to satisfy the British government with their ridiculous requirements for proof of my relationship with my wife so I could live here. Once I was settled though and didn’t need to be able to bring up flight itineraries from 5 years ago, it stopped being something I needed.

        Well that, and lemme tell you, maintaining a popular Free software project is HARD. Everyone has an idea of where stuff should go, but most of the contributions come in piecemeal, so you’re left mostly acting as the one trying to wrangle different styles and architectures into something cohesive… while you’re also holding down a day job. It was stressful to say the least, and with a kid on the way, something had to give.

        But every once in a while I consider installing paperless-ngx just to see how it’s come along, and how much has changed. I’m absolutely delighted that it’s been running and growing in my absence, and from the screenshots alone, I see that a lot of the ideas people had when I was helming made it in in the end.

        • @null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Oh wow! Quite a journey!

          I’d consider Paperless a hall-of-famer for self-hosted software and something most people who get into self-hosting discover at some point, even if they don’t use it.

          So thanks for building it, even if you’ve moved on. You gave the forkers something great to build from.

        • @warmaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Thank you very much for the generously contributed code and time while working on it.The effort you put in, will live on for many years to come.

        • JustEnoughDucks
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Hey man, that is what I used it for, but with the Belgian government! Great piece of software though!

  • @thelittleblackbird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Super good, it is increíble useful and the ability to find any document in almost any place in seconds in awesome.

    Once this is said, you need to stick to a process and it is time consuming, and of course, you need to manually review the automatics tagging feature.

    So, It is not a set and forget like most of the people expect

  • Morethanevil
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Made my life a lot easier. No more looking for documents, all is in one place, fulltext search… Don’t ever want to go back

    But most important: always have a backup ☝🏻

      • Morethanevil
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        No just the data folder itself only contains the documents, but as file FILE00001.pdf

        I do this with pg_dumpall and rclone. Once a day I export the database with pg_dumpall like this :

        docker exec -i paperless pg_dumpall -c -U paperless > /backup/datenbank/homeserver-postgrescontainer-`date +%d.%m.%Y`.sql

        And then I copy this file and the data folder encrypted to a secure cloud (Hetzner Storagebox)

        More info

        Rclone and Read more about Postgresbackup

  • @GravitySpoiled@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using it since a couple of weeks. I barely use it, I uploaded a lot of documents. It is very time consuming to tag every uploaded old document. It works great! But batch commands are missing and the mobile app isn’t on par with the web version.

    Moreover, OSS document scanner and pdf doc scan are great. I’d love to use paperless but I’m not sure if it’s the best solution right now.

  • @tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Slow and unreliable with sqlite, but rock solid and amazing with postgres.

    Today, every document I receive goes into my duplex ADF scanner to scan to a network share which is monitored by Paperless. Documents there are ingested and pre-tagged, waiting for me to review them in the inbox. Unlike other posters here, I find the tagging process extremely fast and easy. Granted, I didn’t have to bring in thousands of documents to begin with but started from a clean slate.

    What’s more, development is incredibly fast-moving and really useful features are added all the time.

  • @Matty_r@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    Does it do OCR? And can you create tags / naming convention / folders based on rules and text within the scanned document? I want to digitize all my paperwork, but there is so much I don’t have time to do the organizing part of it manually.

    • @PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Brother ADS-1700W is amazing!

      • no PC or USB required: place it anywhere
      • WiFi
      • scans a page double-sided to PDF in two seconds!
      • sends file to network share, ready to be consumed by Paperless
      • fully automatic, no button presses needed!
      • tiny footprint
      • document feeder
      • use with separator pages to bulk-scan many documents in one go

      😍

        • @sonstwas@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I’m in the same boat, but didn’t jump so yet. I’ve been following paperless for a while now but every time I look at scanners I’m blown away by their prices…

  • @AtariDump@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Tried to use it, but I don’t want to move all of my data from my currently laid out folder/file structure into a docker container that I then need to backup/upgrade/feed/water/etc., especially when my grasp on docker containers is limited (at best) and I’m dealing with “production” data.

    I wish the software worked like Immach; I could point it at a root folder and it would index everything with read only rights.

    That, and I’m slightly worried that this iteration will stop being supported and it gets forked (again) which is great that it can be forked but I have no idea what would go into migrating data (see my limited docker knowledge from the first sentence).

    • Eager Eagle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Bind mounts. Always use bind mounts for data you care about, otherwise the “managed by docker” volumes are fated to be forgotten.

      It won’t be your file structure as the file tree is managed by paperless, but at least using bind mounts you can easily navigate files and back them up independently or docker and paperless.

    • @B0rax@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Well you point the docker to some external data. You do never store the documents inside the docker. (Because it would get lost when it is updated)

      It is comparable to the way Immich works.

      • @Antiochus@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Maybe I’m misunderstanding this, but their FAQ specifically says:

        By default, your documents are stored inside the docker volume paperless_media. Docker manages this volume automatically for you.

        It also says that documents are removed from the consumption directory, renamed, and put into a folder that you shouldn’t modify.

        And that’s my problem with the project. I want to be able to keep my file name and organizational structure.

        • MaggiWuerze
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          Have a look here: [https://github.com/paperless-ngx/paperless-ngx/blob/main/docker/compose/docker-compose.postgres.yml](paperless-ngx docker-compose.yml)

          down under webserver: you change data:/usr/src/paperless/data to /path/to/where/you/wantorhave/your/files:/usr/src/paperless/data. Same for the media path and you’re done. paperless now uses a folder on your machine instead of a volume. If you want to be clean you will then also remove the volume declaration at the bottom of the file.

          • lemmyvore
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            i think OP wants it to leave their current files alone. But Paperless doesn’t work like that, it deletes the originals and arranges the files its own way.

            • @chaospatterns@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Paperless does support defining a folder structure that you can use to organize documents within that paperless media volume however you should treat it as read only.

              OP could use this as a way to keep their desired folder structure as much as possible, but it would have to be separate from the consumption folder.