• federal reverseM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1624 days ago

    controversial plan

    Please just call it “inhumane”. It’s ok to be pro-humanity.

  • atro_city
    link
    fedilink
    924 days ago

    Stop coming here, please go live a shit life in the countries we’re actively destroying, thanks 😘

  • @Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    824 days ago

    So the EU wants to concentrate deported people In third countries. Maybe ask ask Madagascar if it wants to become a concentration country for the EU, so we can make plans with them…

  • macniel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    524 days ago

    But only to countries that are deemed safe for the rejected asylum seeker, right?

    Right?

    • federal reverseM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Yes, only safe countries including but not limited to Sudan, Syria, Afghanistan, and the Gaza strip. /s

      • Yeather
        link
        fedilink
        English
        124 days ago

        I thought Syria was safe now outside of the Golan occupied region?

        • federal reverseM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          There is a new Islamist regime and Western politicians are wishing for it to be “moderate”. Which it may or may not be, ultimately. Just like the hailed-as-“moderate” new Taliban regime is now making sure that kitchens have no windows, to make women invisible. In any case, I’d say, it’ll take a while before we find out for whom Syria is safe now.

          • @cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7
            edit-2
            23 days ago

            This was the most disgusting thing about the downfall of Assad. The moment it became clear, that he was gone politicians began a race against each other with bets on how fast we can deport all people originating from there back to Syria

    • federal reverseM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      524 days ago

      That’s right-wing bullshit. The right to asylum is a human right. Asylum-seekers virtually never come with a visa.

      • LUC
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -524 days ago

        asylum for what? most come from nations which arent at war.

        • federal reverseM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          There are different and often individual reasons to seek asylum, war is just one. Maybe just inform yourself a little, and do so outside of the right-wing bubble.

          Right-wingers act on foregone conclusions that people are automatically worthless if they speak the wrong language/have the wrong religion/have the wrong skin color. And they will do everything to prove it to themselves. That mindset has nothing to do with reality however.

          • LUC
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -323 days ago

            im not right wing. i also agree with the left on some things. i just think we cant take in people that flee from poorness. our social nets cant handle that. we either need to change our social net rules or take less in.

    • @Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      424 days ago

      Yeah. Like when you come legally and you need to renew your residency permit, you are not allowed to make an appointment more than a month in advance, but the earliest appointment at the office is given in 6 months…