What’s her problem?

1. Its government is fascist

There are plenty of other reasons, but that one seems good enough on its own.

You love to see it!

Genocide is against international law, too.

Republican voters vote for the leopards to eat not just theirs, but everyones’ faces. Well, everyone who’s who’s not rich, anyway. Democrats in power enable the leopards to eat more faces, even though their voters did not vote for it.

Here’s an example of traceability. If the god of the bible were real, eternal, unchanging, etc., there would be no historical record of him being just another god in a pantheon until someone decided to make him THE god. This is just one example of many and you can do this with any god in any religion - there’s nothing notably special about Yahwah aside from how popular his worship became.

I asked because it’s especially suspicious if you have been raised from birth to believe in a god, even if it wasn’t a main focus. My intention isn’t to dissuade you from believing - I couldn’t do that even if I wanted to - but just to encourage you to see Christianity objectively, looking at its history and how it compares with other religions. If you choose to have faith regardless, that’s fine, and in fact is stronger than if you never questioned it at all. I just always prefer that people make an informed decision on things.

Certainly. Any candidate that doesn’t have a traceable origin as being created by people would be a good start, which all the religions of the world do.

I’m quite seriously suggesting that the God of the Bible, and specifically the Christian God, is is the most perfect God that could be imagined

Yes, that’s what people of every religion say about their god. I’m guessing your parents are Christian?

“What if you gave them free will AND ALSO gave them the knowledge of the true nature of existence, rather than relying on them figuring everything out via very obviously man-made religions?”

“Naw.”

I’m judging a fictional character based on how he’s characterized by the book he appears in. There may be a higher power, but the god of the Bible certainly ain’t it.

John Calvin approves.

Not just Christians, that’s a common thing with any cult, be it for a person, a country, etc.

Going by the Bible, it’s both. He acted with malice and proved himself to not be omnipotent many times.

Wow, sounds like a cruel deity that’s definitely not worthy of worship.

deleted by creator

Yes, and the difference is that facts show they are incorrect. False equivocation. “Man sells house after losing job” is not even remotely equal to “Haitians eat peoples’ pets.”

I don’t understand why so many people are eager to (metaphorically) scream “FAKE!!!” at every story (that isn’t highly unlikely) told on the internet. Sure, maybe, but does it even matter? Odds are good something like this did happen somewhere.

Easy to say, hard to do.

Maybe it’s real, maybe not, but it’s certainly plausible.