• @NoisyFlake@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        1241 year ago

        it doesn’t even host it’s own repos

        Yes, and that’s a good thing, otherwise it would be like Manjaro.

        EndeavourOS is perfect if you already know your way around a Linux system but don’t want to spend the time and effort to setup Arch.

        • @aleph@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Technically, Endeavour does have its own repos but they only contain a relatively small number of non-essential packages. But yeah, other than that it’s basically pre-configured Arch with great defaults.

          • @737@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            -161 year ago

            No, the defaults are worse than the arch defaults, the wallpapers are ugly, dracut has worse documentation for desktop use, yay is bad, and the firewall GUI is pointless bloat (the thing on the KDE settings app is just better). Just use Arch.

          • exu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            That’s still CLI based, while Calamares is graphical, no?

            • burgersc12
              link
              fedilink
              91 year ago

              I found archinstall to be very simple to follow, even though the whole thing is shown through the CLI, its basically just one page where you setup everything like partitions, boot, etc. Was a lot easier than I expected with the way everyone talks about it

              • @Owljfien@iusearchlinux.fyi
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                My only difficulty with it was that I have too many disks and partitions and I didn’t want to yeet the wrong one by mistake

              • @Petter1@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yea, it is a very simple CLI based TUI. And I prefer this over GUI in this case, to be honest.

              • exu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                I don’t get your point. Should we call EndevourOS Arch as well by your logic?

        • @737@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Im not saying that it should, but not doing it literally reduces the distro to little more than an install script for Arch. Just use Arch with the archinstall script or the 10 minute manual install.

        • @Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For the record, there’s nothing wrong with Manjaro either, it doesn’t deserve the Internet hate it often gets and I’m happy to use it as my daily driver.

      • @LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        261 year ago

        EndeavourOS has its own repos and uses them to good effect to add small but important quality of life improvements to Arch.

        EOS also had the very good sense to not reinvent the wheel and reimplement the best thing about Arch ( the large, high-quality package library ).

        LMDE ( Mint on Debian ) is another distro that gets this right.