• Destide
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Read the article? :D Doesn’t look like it’s live they just caught it in code

      • tedu
        link
        fedilink
        011 months ago

        Yeah, so if they have the code, they could run it…

        • @xan1242@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          011 months ago

          They kinda don’t have the sources there. That’s a decompilation by IDA in that image.

          But nevertheless they could run it if they set up an arm64 machine, technically.

        • Destide
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          That’s not how code of this magnitude works off the cuff GetPhysicallyInstalledSystemMemory() and GetPhysicalDiskSize()) aren’t defined and might exist in a file they couldn’t access. It’s also in C++ so you’d have to compile it first no one’s going through all that for a visual screenshot of a watermark at this stage

        • ඞmir
          link
          fedilink
          011 months ago

          If you want a serious answer, you could theoretically disable all security checks on Win11 so you could hex-edit patch it to run, but it would be (1) a lot of effort and (2) probably show that it’s nowhere near finished, because it still misses UI integration for example

        • Natanael
          link
          fedilink
          011 months ago

          This might be only for a WinRT build (Windows mm ARM)