• @zurohki@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    01 year ago

    Headline is dumb. If capacitors are better at being batteries than batteries are, they just become the next generation of batteries.

    • @ji17br@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      But capacitors aren’t batteries. Batteries store chemical energy. Capacitors store electrical potential energy. Electronically they behave much differently.

      • @WaterWaiver@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Only for certain types of capacitors. In practice they can overlap quite a bit, especially with common aluminium electrolytic capacitors (these form & dissolve complex aluminium oxide & hydroxide layers on the plates).

      • Em Adespoton
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Yes they do… including not holding a charge when the differential drops too far.

        The real wins are in battery-backed capacitors. Charge the caps fast, then let them keep the batteries topped up.

        • @SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          That’s what I do being off-grid. I have my battery bank then a series of Supercaps to essentially act as an on/off ramp//drawbridge and temper quick demands. Kinda like an inverse soft starter so this is suuuuper interesting to me.

    • 𞋴𝛂𝛋𝛆
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Capacitors can theoretically charge MUCH faster.

      However the galvanic potential of lithium is as large as is practically possible. The galvanic potential is what really matters for a battery. Capacitors are nowhere near the joules per weight/volume.

    • davel [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      Headline is not dumb. There are reasons to make a distinction between the two, the most salient one being that capacitors are several orders of magnitude faster to charge and discharge.