David GerardM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish • edit-21 year agoCopilot AI calls journalist a child abuser, Microsoft tries to launder responsibilitypivot-to-ai.comexternal-linkmessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1195arrow-down10
arrow-up1195arrow-down1external-linkCopilot AI calls journalist a child abuser, Microsoft tries to launder responsibilitypivot-to-ai.comDavid GerardM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish • edit-21 year agomessage-square48fedilink
minus-square@Shitgenstein1@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-21 year ago The details of how the software was programmed should be legally irrelevant. Why? Programmers should be legally liable for what they program.
minus-square@Architeuthis@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year ago Why? Programmers should be legally liable for what they program. Too many degrees of separation between a programmer and the final product and how it’s used, usually. Additionally, the decision to deploy an incomplete product or one that contains known flaws is an administrative decision, not a programming one.
Why? Programmers should be legally liable for what they program.
Too many degrees of separation between a programmer and the final product and how it’s used, usually.
Additionally, the decision to deploy an incomplete product or one that contains known flaws is an administrative decision, not a programming one.