foros.fediverso.gal
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years ago

Vote!

lemmy.ml

message-square
94
fedilink
2

Vote!

lemmy.ml

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 years ago
message-square
94
fedilink
  • Cowbee [he/they]
    link
    fedilink
    0•2 years ago

    Pressures on the system from destabilization are threats of revolution, hence revolutionary pressure.

    • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      0•2 years ago

      Do you think a democratic bureaucratic fully checked and balanced revolution would succeed in overthrowing the structure?

      • Cowbee [he/they]
        link
        fedilink
        0•2 years ago

        Has before and will again.

        • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          0•2 years ago

          Examples?

          • Cowbee [he/they]
            link
            fedilink
            0•2 years ago

            USSR, Cuba, PRC, etc. Read theory and read history books. You’re interested in neither though.

            • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              0•2 years ago

              USSR and PRC had really had checks and balances since they let dictators consolidate power and form cults of personality. You really think those are good examples of your point? Have you read entirely different histories than I have? Which books do you recommend then?

              • Cowbee [he/they]
                link
                fedilink
                0•2 years ago

                The USSR and PRC did not have dictatorships, this is a misunderstanding of the Soviet structure and the concept of the Mass Line. Not even the CIA believed the USSR to be a dictatorship. The USSR had a more democratic structure than the US:

                I recommend reading, among the other books linked, Blackshirts and Reds.

                • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  0•2 years ago

                  Soviet Russia and China were nominally a democracies, but both were controlled by individuals without checks. Stallin and Mau respectively. Again, what history books are you reading that is saying otherwise?

                  • @Alsephina@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    0•2 years ago

                    controlled by individuals without checks

                    Other than the sources Cowbee linked, @Awoo@hexbear.net and @Alaskaball@hexbear.net also compiled a list of transcripts of times Stalin tried to resign from his post.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    0•2 years ago

                    Soviet Russia and China were nominally a democracies, but both were controlled by individuals without checks.

                    Do you have any proof of this? Historical evidence is much the opposite, as the sources I have linked show you.

                    Stallin and Mau respectively.

                    Stalin was not without checks, nor did he control the entire USSR, according to historical evidence including internal CIA memos. Mao was forced out of power due to his failures with the Cultural Revolution, directly proving that checks not only existed, but were used.

                    Again, what history books are you reading that is saying otherwise?

                    The ones I have linked.

                • ∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0•2 years ago

                  Hey. I’m the creator of ComLib, I haven’t been making any EPUBs for some time, but I want to get back into it. Do you have anything you want made into an EPUB? If you don’t, do you have any recommendation for what I should work on next?

                  • Cowbee [he/they]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    0•2 years ago

                    Elementary Principles of Philosophy, by Georges Politzer! Extremely straightforward and fantastic introduction to Dialectical and Historical Materialism, in a manner that builds from the beginnings of Idealism, Materialism, and Dialectics, and how over time these changed and built off each other alongside science, technology, and Mode of Production.

                    Great work, by the way!

              • ∞🏳️‍⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0•
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                I was going to say something like This Soviet World or Russian Justice, but they are not actually history books. They are written from a contemporary standpoint. Pat Sloans Soviet Democracy is another contemporary book.

                I’m sure cowbee will link you to Blackshirts and reds, that is a history book.

Memes@lemmy.ml

!memes@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !memes@lemmy.ml

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
  • 2.35K users / day
  • 2.87K users / week
  • 7.87K users / month
  • 16.5K users / 6 months
  • 55.2K subscribers
  • 16.8K Posts
  • 343K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop
  • Cyclohexane
  • Arthur Besse
  • BE: 0.19.3
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org