• chebra
    link
    fedilink
    16 months ago

    @sweng

    > Why on earth would the license use Github’s very niche definition?

    Maybe because it’s ON GITHUB??

    • @sweng@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      06 months ago

      Thst’s not at all how it works. The definitions made in the TOS do not “leak” out of said TOS (unless the TOS specifies that, which it does not).

      • chebra
        link
        fedilink
        16 months ago

        @sweng It’s much more likely that the term follows the github’s definition, because it’s on github, rather than the wikipedia’s definition, because why would it? You keep hanging on one word in a wikipedia article, let me fix that article and maybe we can stop this nonsense discussion.