@ColdWater@lemmy.ca to Linux@lemmy.ml • edit-24 months agoI'm bored, so I made this Arch Linux sticker for computerlemmy.caimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1168arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1162arrow-down1imageI'm bored, so I made this Arch Linux sticker for computerlemmy.ca@ColdWater@lemmy.ca to Linux@lemmy.ml • edit-24 months agomessage-square25fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@ColdWater@lemmy.caOPlinkfedilink3•edit-24 months agoYes but the x64 indicate it only compatible with 64bit x86/arm CPU
minus-square@pmk@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilink3•4 months agoI just feel that it’s technically wrong to call it x64. x86 is the architecture. The x belongs there, so x86-64 makes more sense, but not “x64”. It’s a marketing term, but it still bothers me.
Isn’t “x64” still an x86 architecture?
Yes but the x64 indicate it only compatible with 64bit x86/arm CPU
I just feel that it’s technically wrong to call it x64. x86 is the architecture. The x belongs there, so x86-64 makes more sense, but not “x64”. It’s a marketing term, but it still bothers me.
AMD64, innit?