☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 months agoFree Thinkerlemmy.mlimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down11
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageFree Thinkerlemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆ to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-squaredavel [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agoName dropping a game theory hypothetical is not an argument.
minus-square@joenforcer@midwest.sociallinkfedilink0•2 months agoYou’re right, it’s not an argument. But it’s a perfectly sufficient reply to a one-word question that doesn’t properly provide an argument of its own.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]linkfedilink0•2 months agoYour original comment only garnered a one word question because you were too vague.
minus-square@joenforcer@midwest.sociallinkfedilink0•2 months agoThe original comment that garnered a one word response wasn’t mine. Thanks though.
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]linkfedilink0•2 months agoThere was a vague “argument,” followed by a request for elaboration, followed by another somehow more vague “argument” from yourself.
Name dropping a game theory hypothetical is not an argument.
You’re right, it’s not an argument. But it’s a perfectly sufficient reply to a one-word question that doesn’t properly provide an argument of its own.
Your original comment only garnered a one word question because you were too vague.
The original comment that garnered a one word response wasn’t mine. Thanks though.
There was a vague “argument,” followed by a request for elaboration, followed by another somehow more vague “argument” from yourself.