@cm0002@lemmy.cafe to Science@mander.xyzEnglish • 8 months agoLying increases trust in science, study findsphys.orgexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up137arrow-down12
arrow-up135arrow-down1external-linkLying increases trust in science, study findsphys.org@cm0002@lemmy.cafe to Science@mander.xyzEnglish • 8 months agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareLvxferre [he/him]linkfedilink22•8 months ago Hyde says that the problem is that, although scientific facts are taught at school, the facts “about” science are not taught well enough. Bingo. They do a poor job teaching people: That failures are not only expected, but welcome; they’ll guide future successes. That conflicts of interest do happen, and peer reviewing is a way to address them. That the current leading theory on something is simply the current best explanation, not some immutable truth. That science doesn’t say “trust me”; it shows you the data, and asks you to find a better way to explain it. We (people all around the world, I think?) also do a poor job at teaching ourselves basic rationality: That you should get suspicious of any institution or group that only shows the good parts - they’re likely hiding shit. Why “trust me” is an insult towards the hearer’s intelligence. Why people shouldn’t vomit certainty on things they cannot reliably know.
minus-square@Redfox8@mander.xyzlinkfedilink6•8 months agoVomiting certainty… I like that turn of phrase!
Bingo. They do a poor job teaching people:
We (people all around the world, I think?) also do a poor job at teaching ourselves basic rationality:
Vomiting certainty… I like that turn of phrase!