@PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agoincest cloneslib.lgbtimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1226arrow-down122
arrow-up1204arrow-down1imageincest cloneslib.lgbt@PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbt to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-square@30p87@feddit.delinkfedilink-1•edit-21 year agoI typically associate “clone” with “an exact copy”, with the same exact molecular layout and even thoughts. So a literal exact copy. Clones on a DNA basis, so something possible for years, would indeed be different in some details.
minus-square@PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES@lib.lgbtOPlinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoThe definition of “clone” you believe in is science fiction nonsense. Why believe in nonsense when the scientific definition of clone is different?
I typically associate “clone” with “an exact copy”, with the same exact molecular layout and even thoughts. So a literal exact copy. Clones on a DNA basis, so something possible for years, would indeed be different in some details.
The definition of “clone” you believe in is science fiction nonsense. Why believe in nonsense when the scientific definition of clone is different?