• Riddick3001
    link
    fedilink
    English
    25
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    And Merz and Scholz got their 2/3 majorities via concession of 100 B for environmental measures for the Greens.

    DW called it humorously, " a Defence Package with a Green Stamp".

    • @B0rax@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It is not „for the greens“ it is for Germany. The environment does not have any political interest.

      • Riddick3001
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        DW : " Despite a huge setback in Germany’s federal election, the Green Party has secured a victory to the tune of billions of euros. The future governing coalition needed the Greens to realize a key political goal.

      • @yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        74 days ago

        For 4 years.

        The next government will be beholden to the debt brake again - and if the CDU happens to be in the opposition, they will block any and all investment to make the governing parties look worse.

        Although I expect the AfD to form a blocking minority for constitutional amendments anyway. Maybe we’ll get the first CDU + AfD government by 2029 - wouldn’t be the first time that German conservatives allow nazis to rise to power.

          • @yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            24 days ago

            The budget, I mean.

            In four years, I suspect nearly all money will be allocated and either the next government manages to make another constitutional amendment or they will lack founding again.

            500 billion is not a lot for 30 years of infrastructure decay.

            • @ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24 days ago

              Yes but the next budget can then be done by a simple 51% majority which is the regular coalition. This dept brake change needed a 2/3 vote and lays the foundation for easier budgets in the future.

              • @yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                23 days ago

                Are you sure? From everything I read, there is only a 500 billion credit for infrastructure and an exception for defense spending above 1%.

                If the 500 billion credit is largely spent and/or designated by 2029, the next government may not be able to pass a budget without a lot of cuts. Especially because retirement spending will explode by then, taking away money from everything else.

                • @ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  You are right, the off-budget fund (Sondervermögen) for infrastructure also needed a 2/3 vote. I was under the impression that the 500 billion credit and how it will be spend was just part of the negotiations for the dept brake reform. My bad.

      • Riddick3001
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 days ago

        The Greens had a strong position in the negotiations. To me it seems they got a good deal.

  • @Eril@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53 days ago

    Still needs a 2/3 majority in the Bundesrat (the “Senate” of germany). The votes should be there, but it is not 100% a given, because of some state governments with mixed opinions. They will vote on it in a session on friday. Let’s hope for the best!

  • ssillyssadass
    link
    fedilink
    English
    54 days ago

    Any move that strengthens the defense of Europe is a good move, I say.

  • poVoqM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    104 days ago

    I wonder why the BBC author seems to have explicitly chosen only images with what appears to be female Bundeswehr soldiers? Kinda odd choice 🤔

    • @misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      My money is on subconscious fear of German women. Maybe they grew up on Allo Allo!

      • jlow (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        74 days ago

        Interesting, for me it seems to be supposed to convey “military good and sexy now” vibes.

        • @misk@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          44 days ago

          I’m a Pole so I probably didn’t consider German military could be good news or sexy, even subconsciously. But then you have those Hugo Boss uniforms. Hmmmm.

          • jlow (he/him)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            100% agree with you that military isn’t good or sexy ever but comparing this photo to like a grizzly, manly man in the mud (which could be sexy as well, lol) I think this image wants to say “Look we’re not the reactionary, sexist boys club we once were (which is a complete lie, probably), come join us, we even got women now!” So basicallly propaganda.

            • @misk@sopuli.xyzOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              24 days ago

              I wouldn’t make this judgment based on a single news piece with 2 pictures total but I’ll be on a lookout if this is a pattern.

    • Linke Socke
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 days ago

      I only see 2 pics in the Article. Would you also wonder why only Men were showed if there were only 2 pics of Men?

    • @NewDay@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      As a German I can say that this picture makes no sense. Merkel was one of the most left-wing Chancellor of all time. Merkel’s coalition has paused compulsory military service and cut the Bundeswehr to the bone. During her time, the Bundeswehr received only 37 billion a year in some cases, although the German economic institutes have calculated that the Bundeswehr needs around 2% of GDP to maintain the status quo. 37 billion is less than 1%.

      • Caveman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 days ago

        The image is overblown comparison but she wasn’t that far left. She cut a lot of government spending and focused hard on fiscal responsibility with the debt brake. She’s pretty much the reason why trains are not on time in Germany.

        She also had to moderate the CDU/CSU position to form a coalition with SPD so there’s no way to know if she would have done things differently with a CDU/CSU majority government.

        But yeah, the picture implying nazi stuff is pretty far from her policies of pro immigration, inclusive economic growth and generally holding up democratic values.