• ssillyssadass
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34 hours ago

    Any move that strengthens the defense of Europe is a good move, I say.

    • @NewDay@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      As a German I can say that this picture makes no sense. Merkel was one of the most left-wing Chancellor of all time. Merkel’s coalition has paused compulsory military service and cut the Bundeswehr to the bone. During her time, the Bundeswehr received only 37 billion a year in some cases, although the German economic institutes have calculated that the Bundeswehr needs around 2% of GDP to maintain the status quo. 37 billion is less than 1%.

  • Riddick3001
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    And Merz and Scholz got their 2/3 majorities via concession of 100 B for environmental measures for the Greens.

    DW called it humorously, " a Defence Package with a Green Stamp".

      • @yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 hours ago

        For 4 years.

        The next government will be beholden to the debt brake again - and if the CDU happens to be in the opposition, they will block any and all investment to make the governing parties look worse.

        Although I expect the AfD to form a blocking minority for constitutional amendments anyway. Maybe we’ll get the first CDU + AfD government by 2029 - wouldn’t be the first time that German conservatives allow nazis to rise to power.

          • @yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 hours ago

            The budget, I mean.

            In four years, I suspect nearly all money will be allocated and either the next government manages to make another constitutional amendment or they will lack founding again.

            500 billion is not a lot for 30 years of infrastructure decay.

            • @ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 hours ago

              Yes but the next budget can then be done by a simple 51% majority which is the regular coalition. This dept brake change needed a 2/3 vote and lays the foundation for easier budgets in the future.

              • @yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 hour ago

                Are you sure? From everything I read, there is only a 500 billion credit for infrastructure and an exception for defense spending above 1%.

                If the 500 billion credit is largely spent and/or designated by 2029, the next government may not be able to pass a budget without a lot of cuts. Especially because retirement spending will explode by then, taking away money from everything else.

                • @ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  22 minutes ago

                  You are right, the off-budget fund (Sondervermögen) for infrastructure also needed a 2/3 vote. I was under the impression that the 500 billion credit and how it will be spend was just part of the negotiations for the dept brake reform. My bad.

      • Riddick3001
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 hours ago

        The Greens had a strong position in the negotiations. To me it seems they got a good deal.

    • @B0rax@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      It is not „for the greens“ it is for Germany. The environment does not have any political interest.

      • Riddick3001
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        DW : " Despite a huge setback in Germany’s federal election, the Green Party has secured a victory to the tune of billions of euros. The future governing coalition needed the Greens to realize a key political goal.

  • poVoqM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    917 hours ago

    I wonder why the BBC author seems to have explicitly chosen only images with what appears to be female Bundeswehr soldiers? Kinda odd choice 🤔

    • Linke Socke
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 hours ago

      I only see 2 pics in the Article. Would you also wonder why only Men were showed if there were only 2 pics of Men?

    • @misk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      My money is on subconscious fear of German women. Maybe they grew up on Allo Allo!

      • jlow (he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        716 hours ago

        Interesting, for me it seems to be supposed to convey “military good and sexy now” vibes.

        • @misk@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          315 hours ago

          I’m a Pole so I probably didn’t consider German military could be good news or sexy, even subconsciously. But then you have those Hugo Boss uniforms. Hmmmm.

          • jlow (he/him)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            100% agree with you that military isn’t good or sexy ever but comparing this photo to like a grizzly, manly man in the mud (which could be sexy as well, lol) I think this image wants to say “Look we’re not the reactionary, sexist boys club we once were (which is a complete lie, probably), come join us, we even got women now!” So basicallly propaganda.

            • @misk@sopuli.xyzOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              27 hours ago

              I wouldn’t make this judgment based on a single news piece with 2 pictures total but I’ll be on a lookout if this is a pattern.