No, they salivate in anticipation.

When they go low, start stomping the fuckers

But don’t worship it. Make it work for the nation, don’t make the nation exist for the sake of the economy. This is what we do in America, and it’s fucking wrong.

Democratic socialism is not unheard of…

I find articles on the onion to be funny in some way. This was just naked approval of the status quo.

I think “describing it as if it were normal” only helps the people who support this arrangement because it gets normalized. That’s where the accusation of conservatism came from, that and the way they tried to shut me down with insults.

Edit: given that there are likely to be a lot of people that agree with this argument unironically, doesn’t it seem irresponsible to play some game where you pretend like you support it? Without ever coming out against it at the end?

Really, it’s just naked approval, with any disapproval left as an exercise to be performed by the reader.

Ii is the real state of the world, but I don’t see any disapproval in the text.

Who would build any sort of factory if they did not know that many people would be available to take the jobs at low-pay rates

Much of the hunger lirerarure talks about how it is important to assure that people are well fed so that they can be more productive. That is nonsense

No one works harder than hungry people.

[…]well-nourished people are far less willing to do that work

For those of us at rhe high end of the social ladder, ending hunger globally would be a disaster.

I guess the irony is lost on me. Nothing here indicates that it’s wrong or should change. Also, you’re a huge asshole.

Edit: in fact I know people (conservatives) who are totally fine with this arrangement. They are huge assholes too, huh isn’t that weird.

This is just a bad thing to say to someone. That’s all.

It’s fucked that the author appears to support such an arrangement…

No, the text is pretty fucked, too

Try to recognize friend from foe, everyone.

You know that the US isn’t going to attack China first.

Then there’s the Trump factor…

What about session state?

You’re right, that’s even dumber

Just like how edge competes with chrome, I suppose.

Apparently it would be a big_deal to change it

Google Groups, according to a random internet stranger who claimed to work at Google - they use it internally and so won’t kill it.

I’m in a similar spot, trying to setup a Linux dev vm (in vmWare). I’m my case, the performance is fine but when my host machine goes to sleep the Linux vm locks up tight.

We should bombard them with 20 megatons of gay swatches, make it rain.