

So the bolshevik state bureaucracy wasn’t a new ruling class giving themselves privileges others didn’t have?
Not exactly. The lowest level of councils is free for everyone to attend to. These neighborhood councils send delegates to the city level and so on. These delegates are revocable so when they don’t do what the basis wants, they are gone. Also on each level, each group can opt out if they want. And decisions are made on the lowest level possible so much more voluntary and less central than Canada
aside from the decentralization of power?
That’s the whole point. If your state concept is broad enough to entail any organization of a certain size, be my gast in a council republic
So we have a factory council open to all workers in the factory to make decisions and send revocable delegates to the city council where they talk to the delegates of farmer councils, consumer councils, … If the factory council makes unfair decisions (and I assume you mean all the workers in the factory belong to the petite bourgeois since they all can attend the council), the consumer council can take collective action to counter it.
So who is the ruling class? Certainly not the bureaucracy as in liberal and bolshevik states since it doesn’t exist here. Or is it the city council? They are revocable, not elected for a given period. Like the soviets before the Bolsheviks ruined everything.
With a world wide net of councils, all connected but not centralized
That’s state socialism, a specific kind of socialism that wants to keep the state apparatus, not realizing that it will always (re)create a ruling class. Different from Libertarian Socialism which unironically want a stateless society, not as a never to reach end goal.
Wait, isn’t socialism all about class solidarity? “Working together regardless of class to fight a common enemy” sounds more like nationalism where at the end the upper class profits most. Unless we are talking about a classless society but that’s not “regardless of class” but “with no class distinction” which sounds very similar when I think about it.
Maybe details are important when the meme says that Canada doesn’t have much autonomy but is very dependent on the US
Don’t get high on your own supply
Actually there are many words for this specific German kind of donut. Krapfen is common, where I live it’s Kreppel. Since it’s arguably the Berlin way of pancake (Berliner Pfannkuchen), in Berlin it’s just called Pfannkuchen and in some spaces it’s called Berliner.
German election on it’s way which isn’t good either
Depends on your position on that. Special military operation to give Christmas back its rightful place in the year.
Sure, there are ways but I honestly don’t see the benefit now that streaming is fast. I want to watch a movie or series once and don’t need to own it, especially since I can restream it or download it from the streaming site
It was the goto streaming site back then. We all learned out lesson once it was down. I looked it up and it was online from 2008 to 2011, feels longer for me but I was torrenting alot before that. German law is strict on torrenting so streaming is the way to go here.
Your analysis fits neatly into what the book Because Internet describes as different waves of “internet people”. First were geeks who went there before it was mainstream, second us millennials growing up as it is getting mainstream, alongside older folks forced to use it at work or voluntarily at home. Third wave are GenZ growing up when everything is easy already and, ironically, also even older folks now that it’s accessible for them.
Boy, I remember how desperate all of Germany was when kino.to went down. It took at least a week until everyone found an alternative!
I’m fine with illusion. Nothing is real anyway
This is three dimensional and the water reflects what is above?? The future is now!